The structure of NFTs—modeled after artwork rather than currencies or shares—implies they are not subject to the same financial regulation as other types of crypto.
Where Bitcoin was hailed as the digital answer to currency, NFTs are now being touted as the digital answer to collectables. But there are plenty of sceptics who think it is all a bubble that is going to burst.
The structure of NFTs—modeled after artwork rather than currencies or shares—implies they are not subject to the same financial regulation as other types of crypto, but they still risk falling afoul of intellectual property law and consumer protection laws.
Anyone who is entering the world of NFT art will need to seriously consider it from the perspective of taxation, corporate structure, and intellectual property.
1.Will transfers of such tokens be subject to a gift tax or viewed as purchase transactions?
2.How will the token be valued separately from the physical property it represents?
3.Which rights will the eventual owner be given for the potential display of the artwork?
Adv.P.M.Mishra of Finlaw Associates along with his International Associate Firm BCH Consulting,Estonia & Finjuris Counsels LLC,UAE has done one indepth analysis on few legal Issues concecerning NFT Internationally.As per Adv.P.M.Mishra’s team,the creation, distribution, ownership and trading of NFTs are new phenomena which raise a plethora of legal issues, many of which are ambiguous or unresolved. Discussed below are some of the more prevalent legal issues about which anyone involved in the minting, sale or acquisition of an NFT should be aware.
A.Copyright – A common misconception is that when you buy an NFT you are acquiring the copyright in the digital artwork. This is not the case. In fact, the situation is essentially the same as if you were buying a painting. When you buy a painting, you are buying only the physical artwork itself and not the ability to make and sell copies or create new works which wholly or substantially reproduce the original. Given the many uncertainties, a buyer would be best advised to conduct rigorous due diligence. Specifically, one would want ascertain whether the seller really is the creator of the work, has good title to it and has obtained the permission of any third party whose IP is present in the digital work.
B.Smart Contracts – Smart contracts govern NFT sales. These are digital contracts where the terms of the agreement are written in the code and are embedded within the purchase tokens. SMART contracts are usually programmed to operate automatically when a pre-defined set of conditions are fulfilled. Because the contractual obligations of smart contracts are performed automatically, it follows that, in theory, fewer legal disputes should arise over the terms and performance of the contract. However, there is practically no case law, legislation or regulation addressing SMART contracts. This creates questions as to whether SMART contracts are actually legally binding.
C) Money laundering- Given the exorbitant sums which are being spent in the NFT market, and the widespread use of cryptocurrency, concerns have been raised about whether these transactions are being used to circumvent the increasingly robust anti-money laundering regulations being implemented around the world. After all, it can be difficult to understand why collectors are spending so many millions on what some might say are essentially just digital autographs. The more cynical commentators may also point to the timing of the rise in popularity of NFTs, which has coincided with the mainstream art market being made subject to anti-money laundering regulations for the first time (in Europe at least). David Hockney, for example, labelled NFTs as the preserve of ‘crooks and swindlers’ when speaking on an art podcast.
The EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD), which came into effect in the UK on 10 January 2020, subjects all “Art Market Participants” (i.e. anyone who acts in the sale or purchase of works of art in excess of €10,000) to a plethora of new duties. Most notable among these is the requirement to carry out Client Due Diligence (CDD) to verify a purchaser’s identity and their source of funds in advance of any transaction.
The legal implications of NFT ownership remain murky. Most likely, it will take a couple of room-clearing court decisions to help owners and litigants navigate their waters.
About the Author
Adv.P.M.Mishra is a lawyer working as Managing Partner of Finlaw Associate,Director at Finlaw Consultancy Pvt.Ltd.,India ,Finjuris Counsels LLC,UAE & BCH Consulting ,Estonia ,Europe.